hi
we are trying to test Odata service in /iwfnd/gw_client
url is /sap/opu/odata/sap/ZDATACOUNT_SRV/DatacountSet(datetime'2015-07-30T00:00:00')
operation GET
getting error
Invalid key predicate type for 'Sdate'. Expected type is 'Edm.DateTimeOffset'
thanks in advance for any suggestion
Dear expert
Scenarion: Repetitive Manufacturing
after wip settlement posting through KK87 system passed a entry wip A/C----dr wip changes A/c----cr
In Define Posting Rules for Settling Work in Process (OKG8) we are maintaining one P/L G/L & one B/S G/L.
Question1: after wip settlement posting system post this entry in these two G/L whatever we maintaining in OKG8
Question2: how Cost element 22 category (External settlement) come in to picture
Hi Modak,
If we set substitution to a User till today(end date =today),system will automatically deactivate the substitution after 12.00 am today.if we check tomorrow there will be no relation ship maintained.
so system is calculating, if enddate < sy-datum, that relation ship automatically will be deleted.
we need this clarification, where exactly it is happening in the program??how system automatically checks that condition every day?? by running job??
i think,some standard FMs RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE_CUT and RMPS_SET_SUBSTITUTE_DELETE are sheduled in jobs??
because these FMs are delemeting or deleting substitutions.
in my program, i have customized with znames...
but that customized code is not being affected,
i think i have to shedule my zfms for affecting my code??
thanks,
Ramesh.
Hi,
There is too little specific technical information provided for anyone to give a meaningful response - it's a guessing game. Can you post the program code?
What is the spool type - ABAP List? If yes, have you tried to put breakpoint on WRITE command?
cheers
Jānis
Hi Pavan,
If your requirement is to generate file name for soap request while save it as file in FTP (Flow1),
write UDF for file name generation in mapping and same file name you can able to send to FTP.
and while placing file in to FTP ,if you need to check file with same name already exist:
if same file name already exist, then it will overwrite on it.
Regards,prasanth.
Hi Experts,
I had a requirement to encrypt some SAP standard and Z tables.
So, please let me know, how we can encrypt the SAP tables.
Thank you.
Jez,
You seem to be confusing requirements consumption with requirements reduction.
Consumption and reduction behavior is defined via the requirements class, OMPO
Best Regards,
DB49
Excellent and very helpful Davy !! Would like to see more from your blog.
Cheers!!
Hi,
Please make the correction: ESG for PCR can be checked in V_503_B (not in infotype 1).
You may try calling the pcr as given below:
PIT ZUKS
regards,
bala.
Hi Experts..
Can you please tell me API available for import the package in B1IF framework.. this is so urgent please help me.
Thanks in Advance
Dhananjay Singh
Ya Okie Sander, As guided I will do that. But this is fairly strange when I remove the customer exit & replace it with a manual input variable(on Calyear) , everything works good to me. Only concern is, It would be pretty difficult to explain to client why this is happening & then ask them to open OSS.
Apart from the LOV(list of values) in 'Select report Filter', strangely when I used Customer Exit , & remove the Employee(Drill Out from the report), report collapse stating no applicable data found. However when I used manual input variable , then when I drill our Employee column behave normal by aggregation key figures next to employee column .
No explanation why this happening.
Kind Regards,
Pankaj
Dear All,
How can I de-activate the BADI implementations of MDG_UI_EVENT_CUSTOMER, MDG_UI_EVENT_SUPPLIER, MDG_UI_EVENT_VENDOR from IMG.
I'm unable to find the path.
Any help will be sincerely appreciated.
Regards,
Tushar.
Hi All ,
I have a requirement to download my view as pdf .
For example I created a view in xml which contains a form and a button (download to PDF) . Once I click on this Button , the entire view should download as PDF . I can also able to set some header and footer for this pdf . Can anyone tell me How can I achieve this.
Thanks
Rizwan
Hi Sudha,
Can you please elaborate in more detail. what do you mean by new set of data??
Is the data coming from source system or data update in BW itself?
Rohit
I see that the documentation should be clearer here.
From what I can see, the deactivation through password-expiry is actually not tracked at all.
Current versions of SAP HANA studio simply seem to check for whether the password lifetime had been exceeded or not.
The user technically is not locked as such, but could log on after a password change.
The LOCKED information in the USERS table shows - as you correctly mentioned - that an account had been actively locked and needs to be specifically unlocked again to be used. The password lifetime doesn't change that.
PASSWORD_CHANGE_NEEDED just means: the current password had been set by the admin and the password rules say that it needs to be changed by the user before anything else.
Now for the monitoring purpose to find out which users can currently effectively access the database, you may use a statement similar to those used by SAP HANA studio:
SELECT user_name,
MAX(CASE WHEN U.ADMIN_GIVEN_PASSWORD = 'TRUE'
AND PP.PROPERTY = 'maximum_unused_inital_password_lifetime'
AND ADD_DAYS(GREATEST(IFNULL (U.LAST_SUCCESSFUL_CONNECT, U.CREATE_TIME), U.PASSWORD_CHANGE_TIME), PP.VALUE) < CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
THEN 1
WHEN U.ADMIN_GIVEN_PASSWORD = 'FALSE'
AND PP.PROPERTY = 'maximum_unused_productive_password_lifetime'
AND ADD_DAYS(IFNULL (U.LAST_SUCCESSFUL_CONNECT, U.CREATE_TIME), PP.VALUE) < CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
THEN 2
ELSE 0
END) LOCK_REASON
FROM SYS.USERS U,
SYS.M_PASSWORD_POLICY PP
WHERE
pp.property in ('maximum_unused_inital_password_lifetime', 'maximum_unused_productive_password_lifetime')
group by user_name
This would return 1 when the user account still has the initial password but the max. lifetime for initial passwords has passed.
It returns 2 if the password wasn't the initial anymore but the account hasn't been used for longer than <maximum_unused_productive_password_lifetime> days.
If none of the conditions apply, then a zero is returned.
As you can tell this query doesn't cover INVALID_CONNECT_ATTEMPTS - so you may work this in, too.
My view on this is that the USERS table contains rather static information on activation/deactivation while the more dynamic aspects (password lifetime, invalid connection attempts, etc. ) need to be evaluated dynamically.
And that makes sense as you could change the parameters and then the formerly "locked" users would be able to be used again.
- Lars
- Lars
Thanks, Gajendra.
Users want to execute default.lgf for SOME input schedules only. I do not know the business decision behind that. I understand from the forum that it is not possible to do that.
Thank you,
Peri
Hi Venetia ,
I want to help you over this can you provide the error log you are getting.
Regards,
Abhi
Hi Divya,
Please check below link.
Stock Transport with Delivery - ERP SCM - SCN Wiki
Regards,
D.Singh
Hi,
After reading the notes I agree I am unfortunately using reduce and consume interchangeably for my problem. Technically I am talking about a reduction of the PIR. I have read through most of the documentation mentioned (I haven't got my SAP marketplace login at home so I can only read the notes that haven't been reproduced elsewhere on the web until I get back to work next week). I still cannot fathom why my 311 reduces the PIR.
My situation is as follows
I have 2 storage location for material A, MAIN which is MRP relevant and HOLD which is not MRP relevant.
I have a PIR for material A of 1000m and 200m in stock in SLOC MAIN.
MD04 shows the Stock and PIR and creates a planned order for 800m.
I now use a 311 transaction to move 100m from MAIN to HOLD.
MD04 now shows a PIR of 900m and 100m in stock and creates a planned order for 800m.
Interrogating the PIR via MD62 shows a planned quantity of 900m and a withdrawn quantity of 100m.
So if OMJJ is driving this behavior why do other transaction codes listed with Ind. rqmts reduc. set on, not do exactly the same. I keep referring to 101 as this is set this way and is a transaction we frequently use, but equally 105, 109 etc also appear to have same config but are not giving the same results.
I can only assume there is other config at play, however I have been through a wealth of other options OVZI, OVZG, OVZH, OMPO and none are clearly signaling to me why the behavior is different.
Ultimately my goal is just to stop the 311 reducing my PIR, the none MRP relevant location is a holding area where goods are assumed bad until such time as they are scrapped or reinstated to an MRP relevant storage location. In our process I need to replan to make these goods, despite the possibility they may come back into play. The answer may well be in the documents I have been looking at, but I haven't found anything that clearly defines what transaction codes will reduce the PIR and when.
Hope this helps clarify my issue,
Regards,
Jez
Can some one pls. help on this?
Thank you,
Peri